These are the values obtained for gain and readout noise:
Up-Left Quad | Down-left Quad | Up-Right Quad | Down Right Quad | Average | |
Gain (e per ADU) | 4.18 | 4.25 | 4.16 | 4.15 | 4.18 |
Readout noise (e) | 21.63 | 22.95 | 22.48 | 20.92 | 21.99 |
These are the parameter obtained with polyfit of IRAF to calculate the parameters of the fitting for each graph (in all the cases the correlation was over 0.999). The polynomial used for the fitting is of third order:
Statistic for up-left quadrant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statictic for down-left quadrant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statistic for up-right quadrant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statictic for down-right quadrant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statictic for whole frame:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can see that the median is more or less constant, independ of the integration time. This fact is different to the statistic done during Feb99, when the median depended clearly with the exposure time. The shape of the curve is almost but much smaller. More studies have to be done to clearyfy this point.
Here
you can see the results obtained during Feb99.